ECONOMICS: Low taxes are preferable over extensive government services

Every year at tax time, you’re probably hoping to get a refund or may have a tax bill to pay, but how does paying these taxes make you feel? Do you feel like your tax dollars are helping to support society and essential services, or do you think individuals could better spend that money, meaning we should have fewer taxes? Could society function better if taxes were lower, allowing people to choose how they spend or invest their money? Or does this approach sacrifice essential services that support society as a whole?

"Welcome to your Dinner Table Debates Daily Deep Dive, where we explore real topics from our decks and give you everything you need to debate in under 10 minutes. Today's topic is ‘Low Taxes Are Preferable Over Extensive Government Services’ and comes from our Full Size Essentials Collection deck. Let’s dig in!"

While this is a common debate between Republicans, who prioritize lower taxes, and Democrats, who prefer more government services, this discussion started with the first societies ever created and has inspired philosophical speeches for centuries. American philosopher Henry David Thoreau famously said, “That government is best which governs least,” reflecting a belief that minimal government intervention allows more freedom and prosperity. Meanwhile, others argue for a government role in providing public services to promote equality and well-being, a concept promoted by philosophers like John Stuart Mill, who saw government intervention as a way to ensure equal opportunities for all.

This debate is essential to how societies function and impacts nearly every aspect of daily life. Whether through healthcare, education, or social welfare, the balance between taxes and government services influences our economy, freedom, and how resources are distributed. Understanding this debate sheds light on what kind of society we prefer and what values we prioritize—individual freedom or collective support.

Agree – Low Taxes Are Preferable Over Extensive Government Services

1. Increases Individual Freedom and Financial Control Lower taxes allow individuals to control how they spend their own money, promoting personal choice in areas like healthcare, education, and retirement planning. By keeping more income, people can invest, save, or spend based on their priorities rather than government-mandated programs.
2. Encourages Economic Growth and Innovation Reducing taxes can stimulate economic growth by allowing businesses to invest more in their operations, leading to job creation and increased innovation. The United States saw rapid economic expansion in the 1980s after a series of tax cuts, with the economy growing at an average rate of 3.6% annually, as businesses had more capital to expand and hire. Advocates believe that less taxation results in more economic activity and a stronger economy overall.
3. Reduces Government Waste and Bureaucracy With lower taxes, the government has fewer resources to manage, reducing the risk of inefficiency and waste. A leaner government can focus on essential functions, streamlining operations, and decreasing taxpayer burden. Studies have found that large government programs often suffer from inefficiencies due to layers of bureaucracy, with up to 30% of funds in some public programs lost to administrative costs.

Disagree – Low Taxes Are Not Preferable Over Extensive Government Services

1. Essential Services for All Taxes fund essential services like healthcare, education, and infrastructure like roads and bridges that everyone depends on, regardless of income. When these services are publicly funded, they provide a safety net and level the playing field, ensuring that no one is left behind. Countries with extensive social services, such as those in Scandinavia, consistently rank high in happiness and quality of life, demonstrating the benefits of a robust public safety net.
2. Addresses Income Inequality and Social Injustice Extensive government services funded by taxes can reduce economic disparities by providing equal access to opportunities. For example, government-funded education allows everyone to receive a quality education, regardless of family income, helping to break the cycle of poverty. In contrast, low-tax systems often lead to wealth concentration, which can exacerbate inequality.
3. Public Services Improve Overall Productivity Public services, such as infrastructure, education, and healthcare, contribute to productivity by creating a healthy, educated, and mobile workforce. In the U.S., publicly funded highways, schools, and hospitals make economic activities smoother and more efficient. These services benefit society as a whole, which is challenging to replicate in a low-tax, low-service system.

1. Rebuttal to “Increases Individual Freedom and Financial Control” While low taxes may offer more personal spending choices, it can lead to significant disparities in access to essential services like healthcare and education. This freedom might benefit the wealthy more, leaving low-income individuals without affordable options for critical needs.
2. Rebuttal to “Essential Services for All” When we have extensive services funded by high taxes, it can foster dependency on government support, discouraging self-sufficiency. People should have the incentive to make choices that benefit them personally rather than relying on one-size-fits-all government programs.

This debate is complex because it hinges on the values we prioritize: individual freedom versus collective support. Balancing economic efficiency with social welfare remains an ongoing challenge, and neither side offers a perfect solution for every situation.

Today, we examined whether low taxes are preferable over extensive government services. The Agree side argued that it promotes individual freedom, economic growth, and reduced government waste, while the Disagree side highlighted the importance of publicly funded services to ensure equality, address social injustices, and improve societal productivity. This debate invites us to consider what kind of society we wish to create and the role we want government to play in our lives.

The debate over low taxes versus extensive government services is especially relevant now with major U.S. tax policy decisions on the horizon. Both major political parties propose different approaches to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), set to expire in 2025, which could raise taxes unless renewed. Generally, Republicans favor extending most TCJA provisions to keep taxes low across income levels, believing this will drive economic growth. Democrats, however, aim to maintain lower tax rates for households earning under $400,000 while introducing higher taxes on wealthier individuals and corporations to fund social programs and reduce income inequality.

The stakes are high: If Congress doesn’t extend the TCJA, many Americans could see their tax bills rise, with changes such as a higher top tax rate (39.6% instead of 37%), lower estate tax thresholds, and a reduction in the standard deduction. The outcome of the 2024 elections will be crucial in shaping these policies, influencing the balance between tax rates and funding for services such as Medicare and social welfare initiatives.

This discourse is not unique to the U.S.; many European countries with expansive welfare programs maintain higher tax rates to support these services, contrasting with lower-tax models like those of the U.S. and Australia. Ultimately, each approach reflects differing beliefs about economic growth and social equity.

Looking to dig into this topic even more? When playing Dinner Table Debates, the Agree side sets the stage and defines the debate topic. This one topic could lead to further discussions about tax structures, the role of government in providing social welfare, and the trade-offs between personal responsibility and collective support. Here are some ways that Agree could redefine this debate topic:

• “Low taxes are preferable for small businesses but not for large corporations.”
  • What unique challenges do small businesses face compared to large corporations regarding tax burdens?
  • How would varying tax rates impact local economies and job creation at different business sizes?
• “Low taxes are preferable over government-funded healthcare.”
  • How might low taxes with more privately funded healthcare affect access or quality of care?
  • Would a low-tax system with minimal government-funded healthcare create significant gaps in health outcomes across communities or … ?
• “Low taxes are preferable in high-income states.”
  • Would high-income states benefit more from low taxes due to their existing resources, or could it widen the economic gap within the state?
  • How might a low-tax policy affect the quality of public services in a high-income state compared to a low-income state?

"If you enjoyed our deep dive, you can debate this topic and many others by getting your own Dinner Table Debates deck at DinnerTableDebates.com. It's a unique game because every round starts with randomly assigning agree or disagree, then you pick the topic, meaning you might be debating for something you disagree with—or vice versa! But that's the point! Stretch your brain, gain clarity, improve critical thinking and empathy, and have fun doing it! You can also join the debate on our Instagram and TikTok. Get ready for some thought-provoking discussions that challenge your assumptions and broaden your understanding of the world around you! Happy debating, and remember, everyone is always welcome at the table."